I wondered if the time shift between the 1890s and the
present would present a challenge in both keeping my interest and following
transition in the story. I was needlessly worried as the story flowed smoothly
and had no difficulty keeping people “time straight”. We all have our favorite characters and get
frustrated when their creator kills them off or fails to produce another
installation in a timely manner. What
would happen if Mitch Rapp or Gabriel Allon ceased to exist? This is exactly the problem followers of A
Conan Doyle’s writings had to deal with when, frustrated and probably jealous
of the attention Sherlock Holmes was getting at the expense of his creator,
Doyle kills Holmes!
Fast forward to 2010. A convention of individuals who are
intrigued with Sherlock Holmes convenes. One member has announced he has found
the lost diary of Doyle which mysteriously disappeared in the late 1890s. The
member is found dead and the newest initiate into the Sherlockian club is left
trying to solve the mystery. What ensues
is a fast paced look at the mystery surrounding the disappearance of a diary
written by Arthur Conan Doyle and the death of the person who claims to have
found the same diary a hundred years later.
The novel keeps the interest of the reader in ways previous
ones switching from time to time have failed to do. It seems like the story is
one and not two separate accounts, or mysteries. I appreciate the way Moore has enabled the
reader to switch back and forth without ruining any of the continuity of the
story or the mystery within. While many
shifts and twists help maintain interest in the book, the reader is not left
out in the cold. Clues are provided,
intrigue abounds and a conclusion is provided that leaves the reader wondering
but fulfilled.
I personally believe the book gives some insight into the
lives of both Doyle and the 21st Century sleuths. Doyle was a known addict. How did that impact
his ability to create and maintain the character of Holmes? Was the addiction the source of his jealousy
of Holmes? The role of Harold is the modern day Watson. He does a great job
with it and even manages to overcome a bit of his own naivety. Is this good or
bad?
What will Harold do after the mystery has been solved? We
know how he reacted to the “solving” in the book but how would he react after
he is back home and thinking things over?
Does he keep the girlfriend? Does
he go back to being a Holmes nerd wearing the hat to hide his
insecurities? I must say the book gave more than I expected and I am happy it did!
No comments:
Post a Comment